Oral Presentation 26th ACMM “2020 Visions in Microscopy”

X-ray phase-contrast imaging using speckle or a grid; Applications and extensions (#111)

Kaye S Morgan 1 , Celebrity Groenendijk 2 , Florian Schaff 1 , Martin Donnelley 3 4 , David Parsons 3 4 , Patricia Cmielewski 3 4 , Alexandra McCarron 3 4 , Chantelle Carpentieri 3 4 , David Paganin 1
  1. School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
  2. Medical Physics, Technical University of Delft, Delft, 2628 CD, Netherlands
  3. Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  4. Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

X-ray imaging approaches that are sensitive to phase effects can capture weakly-attenuating sample features that are not easily seen with conventional x-ray imaging. One of the most recently-developed approaches to capturing phase effects is single-grid or speckle-tracking phase contrast x-ray imaging. This approach directly resolves a reference pattern, created by illuminating either a grid [1, 2] or a piece of sandpaper [3, 4], and looks at sample-induced distortions to that reference pattern to extract phase effects and/or dark-field effects. At the x-ray energies used at synchrotron imaging beamlines, these directly-resolved distortions are typically in the micron range, so the approach is well-suited to microscopy with a field of view close to 1mm across. This method of phase contrast imaging presents a distinct advantage for high-speed or time-resolved imaging, in that only one sample exposure is required to extract attenuation, phase and dark-field effects. Other advantages include a sensitivity to a slowly-changing sample thickness/density via differential contrast, and the ability to simultaneously capture differential contrast in both directions within the image plane (e.g. x and y) [5].
This presentation will describe recent developments in single-grid/speckle imaging, including computational approaches to the extraction of contrast modalities, biomedical applications of the technique [6], the extension to single-exposure, single-energy material segmentation [7], and a theoretical model to describe the combined attenuation, phase and dark-field effects [8, 9].

  1. E. Bennett, R. Kopace, A. Stein, & H. Wen, (2010). Medical Physics, 37(11), 6047-6054.
  2. K. Morgan, P. Modregger, S. Irvine, S. Rutishauser, V. Guzenko, M. Stampanoni, & C. David, (2013), Optics Letters, 38(22), 4605-4608.
  3. K. Morgan, D. Paganin, & K. Siu, (2012), Applied Physics Letters, 100(12), 124102.
  4. S. Bérujon, E. Ziegler, R. Cerbino, & L. Peverini, (2012), Physical Review Letters, 108(15), 158102.
  5. K. Morgan, T. Petersen, M. Donnelley, N. Farrow, D. Parsons, & D. Paganin (2016). Optics Express, 24(21), 24435-24450.
  6. K. Morgan, M. Donnelley, N. Farrow, A. Fouras, N. Yagi, Y. Suzuki,... & D. Parsons, (2014), AJRCCM, 190(4), 469-472.
  7. C. Groenendijk, F. Schaff, & K. Morgan, (2019), in preparation.
  8. D. Paganin & K. Morgan, (2019), arXiv:1908.01473.
  9. K. Morgan & D. Paganin, (2019), arXiv:1908.01452.